Student Evaluations- CWU Scanned Responses
Fall 2003

[For all questions: 5 is highest rating, 1 is lowest rating]

| Ellensburg | Yakima | Wenatchee | Moses Lake |

Ellensburg

  Averages- Ellensburg
  Class Dept. COB CWU
  DIAGNOSTIC FEEDBACK FOR THE INSTRUCTOR        
1 Instructor met class regularly and on time. 5.00 4.70 4.76 4.78
2 Class sessions were well organized. 4.90 4.22 4.39 4.49
3 The instructor provided useful feedback on student progress. 4.60 4.09 4.12 4.27
4 I was confident in the instructor's knowledge. 4.80 4.50 4.59 4.67
5 The instructor was enthusiastic. 4.40 4.38 4.42 4.60
6 The instructor encouraged students to express themselves. 4.50 4.17 4.31 4.46
7 Extra help was available when needed. 4.40 4.23 4.26 4.44
8 Course objectives were clearly stated. 4.80 4.43 4.46 4.53
9 The instructor gave clear explanations. 4.30 3.94 4.19 4.36
10 The instructor presented alternative explanations when needed. 4.50 4.05 4.27 4.43
11 Answers to student questions were clear and meaningful. 4.25 4.01 4.23 4.42
12 Instructor raised important questions or problems. 4.63 4.19 4.36 4.50
13 Appropriate examples and illustrations were used. 4.50 4.26 4.44 4.57
14 The instructor's speech was clear and easily understood. 4.63 4.38 4.48 4.60
  INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE        
15 Class time was used efficiently. 4.67 4.20 4.35 4.45
16 Instructor was interested in whether students learned. 4.33 4.25 4.32 4.50
17 Instructor helped develop an appreciation for the field. 4.33 4.05 4.23 4.38
18 Instructor applied course material to real world issues. 4.67 4.35 4.51 4.54
19 Course objectives were met. 4.56 4.38 4.47 4.58
20 Assigned readings and other out-of-class work were useful. 3.56 4.21 4.18 4.26
21 Evaluative and grading techniques (tests, papers, projects, etc.) were fair. 4.10 4.32 4.29 4.46
22 Amount of work was appropriate to course level and credits. 4.33 4.22 4.37 4.47
23 Student responsibilities and requirements were clearly stated. 4.56 4.47 4.50 4.57
24 Instructor treated students with respect, regardless of sex, race or age. 4.67 4.72 4.73 4.81
  HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE?        
25 The intellectual challenge presented to you. 4.00 4.42 4.29 4.18
26 The amount of effort needed to succeed in this course 4.33 4.48 4.33 4.23
27 Your involvement (doing assignments, attending classes, etc.) 4.89 4.48 4.44 4.47
  GENERAL EVALUATION        
28 Course as a whole was: 4.00 3.96 4.14 4.24
29 Instructor's teaching effectiveness was: 4.00 3.98 4.17 4.36

 

Yakima

  Averages-Yakima
  Class Dept. COB CWU
  DIAGNOSTIC FEEDBACK FOR THE INSTRUCTOR        
1 Instructor met class regularly and on time. 4.86 4.70 4.76 4.78
2 Class sessions were well organized. 4.71 4.22 4.39 4.49
3 The instructor provided useful feedback on student progress. 4.29 4.09 4.12 4.27
4 I was confident in the instructor's knowledge. 4.71 4.50 4.59 4.67
5 The instructor was enthusiastic. 4.14 4.38 4.42 4.60
6 The instructor encouraged students to express themselves. 4.57 4.17 4.31 4.46
7 Extra help was available when needed. 4.71 4.23 4.26 4.44
8 Course objectives were clearly stated. 4.57 4.43 4.46 4.56
9 The instructor gave clear explanations. 4.14 3.94 4.19 4.36
10 The instructor presented alternative explanations when needed. 4.14 4.05 4.27 4.43
11 Answers to student questions were clear and meaningful. 4.29 4.01 4.23 4.42
12 Instructor raised important questions or problems. 4.57 4.19 4.36 4.50
13 Appropriate examples and illustrations were used. 4.43 4.26 4.44 4.57
14 The instructor's speech was clear and easily understood. 4.86 4.38 4.48 4.60
  INFORMATION ABOUT THE COURSE        
15 Class time was used efficiently. 4.57 4.20 4.35 4.45
16 Instructor was interested in whether students learned. 4.29 4.25 4.32 4.50
17 Instructor helped develop an appreciation for the field. 4.43 4.05 4.23 4.38
18 Instructor applied course material to real world issues. 4.57 4.35 4.51 4.54
19 Course objectives were met. 4.71 4.38 4.47 4.58
20 Assigned readings and other out-of-class work were useful. 4.29 4.21 4.18 4.26
21 Evaluative and grading techniques (tests, papers, projects, etc.) were fair. 4.00 4.32 4.29 4.46
22 Amount of work was appropriate to course level and credits. 4.29 4.22 4.37 4.47
23 Student responsibilities and requirements were clearly stated. 4.57 4.47 4.50 4.57
24 Instructor treated students with respect, regardless of sex, race or age. 4.86 4.72 4.73 4.81